Toxic Coal Ash in Puerto Rico: The Hazardous Legacy of the AES
HomeHome > News > Toxic Coal Ash in Puerto Rico: The Hazardous Legacy of the AES

Toxic Coal Ash in Puerto Rico: The Hazardous Legacy of the AES

Jul 09, 2023

Coal Ash in the U.S.

May 4, 2023

Applied Energy Services continues to contaminate the air, soil, and water in Puerto Rico with toxic coal ash.

Since it started burning coal in 2002, the Applied Energy Services — Puerto Rico (AES-PR) coal plant in Guayama, Puerto Rico has failed to contain its coal ash, contaminating the air, soil, and water. AES-PR stored coal ash — the hazardous substance left after burning coal for energy — in a mountainous pile. For years, AES-PR distributed coal ash as cheap fill material, and it was dumped at dozens of sites in southeastern Puerto Rico. The AES-PR coal plant continues to produce an average of 800 tons of coal ash per day.

On this page

Coal ash contains hazardous pollutants including arsenic, boron, cobalt, chromium, lead, lithium, mercury, molybdenum, radium, selenium, and other heavy metals, which have been linked to cancer, heart and thyroid disease, reproductive failure, and neurological harm.

Industry's own data indicate that across the country 91% of coal plants are currently polluting groundwater above federal health standards with toxic pollutants.

Coal ash remains one of our nation's largest toxic industrial waste streams. U.S. coal plants continue to produce approximately 70 million tons every year.

Despite EPA's 2015 Coal Ash Rule, which created the first-ever safeguards for coal ash disposal, many coal ash dumps remain unregulated due to sweeping exemptions for legacy coal ash ponds and inactive landfills.

The exempted coal ash dumps are sited disproportionately in low-income communities and communities of color.

The EPA agreed to address some of these exemptions at power plants under revised rules to be enacted in 2024. But the revised rules will likely not address coal ash that was dumped off-site or used as fill, which occurred at dozens of locations in Puerto Rico.

The magnitude of harm from recklessly dumped toxic coal ash requires decisive action from federal and state regulators.

The longer enforcement is delayed, the more hazardous contaminants enter Puerto Rico's air and water and the more difficult cleanup will be. EPA must swiftly strengthen the Coal Ash Rule to prohibit the dangerous placement of unencapsulated toxic coal ash and protect all Puerto Rican communities from coal ash pollution.

Puerto Rico's one coal-burning power plant is located on the southeast coast of the archipelago. AES, a multinational corporation with assets exceeding $33 billion, opened its Guayama plant in 2002. Since the plant's opening, AES-PR has failed to protect Puerto Ricans from the plant's toxic waste. AES-PR leaves its enormous coal ash pile uncovered, which has allowed the ash to blow into homes and nearby schools and leaves it vulnerable to hurricane-force winds and rain. The AES-PR coal ash pile is sited above the South Coast Aquifer that serves as the source of drinking water for tens of thousands of people in southern Puerto Rico. Groundwater monitoring data published by AES-PR reveals levels of boron, lithium, molybdenum, selenium, and sulfate above federal health standards.[i]

Fugitive dust emissions from the waste pile have caused harm to the health of nearby residents. For over a decade, the waste pile dwarfed all other structures at the plant and still stands with no cover, totally exposed to the persistent Caribbean winds and tropical rainstorms.

Fugitive dust emissions can have grave consequences for the local community. In July 2016, the University of Puerto Rico, Graduate School of Public Health conducted an epidemiological study of communities downwind from the AES-PR plant. The study concluded that the Guayama community suffers higher incidence of respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease, asthma, hives, spontaneous abortions, bronchitis than a community whose air and environment are not impacted by the power plant.[ii]

Despite the legal requirement to do so, AES-PR has failed to implement a corrective action remedy that would adequately clean up the groundwater contamination at the Guayama plant and prevent further contamination. AES-PR's plan consists of installing a synthetic liner under the waste pile in dangerous proximity to the water table and employing a "do nothing" approach known as Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) to watch rather than clean up the existing groundwater contamination. In January 2022, EPA issued a letter to AES-PR identifying deficiencies in the company's cleanup plan and reiterating the EPA's position that MNA is not an appropriate remedy.

In June 2022, EPA Region 2 issued a Notice of Potential Violations identifying several violations of the Coal Ash Rule's groundwater monitoring and reporting requirements. Specifically, AES-PR failed to provide groundwater data from certain samples taken over the past five years that are critical to determining the full nature and extent of contamination from the waste pile.

AES-PR repeatedly violated federal clean air standards. On July 25, 2022, EPA Region 2 issued a notice of violation under the Clean Air Act, finding that the Guayama plant exceeded emission limits for pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and mercury. According to the notice, AES-PR also violated the Puerto Rico Regulations for the Control of Atmospheric Pollution by exceeding the visible emissions and opacity limitations 86 times in 2021. The notice also identified several violations of the Clean Air Act's Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. AES-PR also violated the reporting provisions of the plant's Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit by failing to submit quarterly reports of all excess emissions to EPA for 2017 through 2021.

From approximately 2004 to 2012, AES-PR distributed more than 2 million tons of coal ash as cheap fill material to dozens of sites in Puerto Rico, including housing, commercial developments, and road projects.[iii] The coal ash, called "Agremax" by AES-PR, is comprised of fly ash and bottom ash mixed with water. In 2012, Vanderbilt University completed a study on the leaching potential of Agremax for EPA, Region 2 and concluded that Agremax leaches particularly high concentrations of arsenic, boron, chloride, chromium, fluoride, lithium, and molybdenum.[iv]

AES-PR's coal ash was often used to grade sites in flood-prone areas. In some cases, ash was placed in excess quantities and in areas clearly not safe for coal ash disposal.[v] The majority of sites are directly above the South Coast Aquifer and close to public supply water wells, wetlands, or the Jobos Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. Puerto Rico's rainy, hurricane-prone climate is incompatible with the use of coal ash for structural fill. The archipelago's high population density and reliance on groundwater for drinking water increases the risk of human exposure to coal ash pollutants. At numerous sites, the toxic ash still lies unused and uncovered on the ground, and these piles pose dangers in residential areas, near parks, a school and even a hospital. At numerous sites, the coal ash was left uncovered or covered only with a thin layer of dirt, which quickly eroded. Fugitive dust from these uncovered piles and roads is common.

The Guayama region, where many residents are Afro-Puerto Rican, has a high rate of poverty. According to the Toxic Release Inventory, this region suffers the greatest contamination of any region in Puerto Rico. The region also has among the highest unemployment and school dropout rates on the archipelago. The region experienced a sharp decrease in medical services with only one hospital currently in operation. AES-PR's waste pile, offsite disposal of coal ash in the region, and continued reckless operation of the plant impose disproportionate public health risks to this environmental justice community.

The AES-PR waste pile is the only coal ash disposal site in Puerto Rico that is regulated by the 2015 Coal Ash Rule.

The coal ash waste pile is contaminating groundwater at unsafe levels.

In addition, there are approximately 30 unregulated coal ash fill sites, consisting of both covered and uncovered ash deposits, throughout southeastern Puerto Rico.

Because AES-PR was not required to report the location of ash placement, the number of dumpsites that escape federal regulation remains unknown. While these unregulated sites are almost certainly contaminating water and threatening health and the environment, monitoring data are not available.

"Coal Ash Dumps": CCR 2021 Inspection Report: AES Puerto Rico

All data on groundwater contamination from coal ash derived from the utilities’ publicly accessible CCR Compliance Data and Information websites, and exceedances were calculated by Environmental Integrity Project.

[iii] See 84 Fed. Reg. at 21,328.

[iv] See A.C. Garrabrants et al., Leaching Behavior of "AGREMAX" Collected from a Coal-Fired Power Plant in Puerto Rico, EPA-600/R-12/724, December 2012 (attached); see also, D.S. Kosson et al., Characterization of Coal Combustion Residues from Electric Utilities -Leaching and Characterization Data, at 18 (EPA-600/R-09/151) (Dec. 2009) (prepared for EPA, Office of Research & Dev., Nat’l Risk Mgmt. & Research Lab.), available at http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/600r09151/600r09151.html.

[v] See 80 Fed. Reg. at 21,329. EPA stated:

[T]he available facts illustrate several of the significant concerns associated with unencapsulated uses. Specifically, the AGREMAX was applied without appropriate engineering controls and in volumes that far exceeded the amounts necessary for the engineering use of the materials. Inspections of some of the sites where the material had been placed showed use in residential areas, and to environmentally vulnerable areas, including areas close to wetlands and surface waters and over shallow, sole-source drinking water aquifers. In addition, some sites appeared to have been abandoned.

Consistent with the proposed rule, EPA does not consider the practices described in this section to be beneficial use, but rather waste management that would be subject to the requirements of the final rule.

Christine Santillana, Legislative Counsel, Earthjustice, [email protected]

Lisa Evans, Senior Counsel, Earthjustice, [email protected].

Alabama

Arizona

Colorado

Delaware

Florida

Georgia

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kentucky

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Missouri

Montana

North Carolina

North Dakota

New Jersey

New York

Ohio

Pennsylvania

Puerto Rico

South Carolina

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Virginia

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

The Great Lakes

Tennessee Valley Authority

Earthjustice fights in the courts for a long-term solution to the toxic menace of coal ash. And we act on behalf of dozens of clients and over 100 coalition partners to defeat legislative attempts to subvert federally enforceable safeguards of coal ash.

Clean Energy Program

Earthjustice's Clean Energy Program uses the power of the law and the strength of partnership to accelerate the transition to 100% clean energy.

The legal case: Coal Ash Regulations

Applied Energy Services continues to contaminate the air, soil, and water in Puerto Rico with toxic coal ash. Action Needed The longer enforcement is delayed, the more hazardous contaminants enter Puerto Rico's air and water and the more difficult cleanup will be. Harm to Groundwater from the AES-PR Coal Plant Toxic Fugitive Dust from the AES-PR Coal Plant AES-PR Is Not Cleaning Up Contaminated Groundwater as Mandated by the Federal Coal Ash Rule AES-PR's Violation of Clean Air Act Requirements Coal Ash Contamination in Puerto Rico from "Fill" Projects Environmental Justice and Coal Ash in Puerto Rico